Apple vs Qualcomm: Who Extorted Whom?

Apple would have gone with WiMAX, if Qualcomm hadn't agreed to pay to Apple

Junko Yoshida, EETimes, Sept. 06, 2017 – 

MADISON, Wis. - A dispute that has now escalated into an epic legal battle between technology juggernauts, Apple and Qualcomm, is complex and multi-layered, its facets all loosely connected and geographically sprawling.

The simple narrative, told by Apple, is that Qualcomm has illegally maintained a monopoly over the semiconductors used in cellphones.

The U.S. Fair Trade Commission (FTC) has argued that Qualcomm customers "accept elevated patent royalties they otherwise would refuse" because they're forced "to negotiate in the shadow of Qualcomm's threat to withhold chips." As a result, "Qualcomm collects far more in royalties than other licensors in the industry with comparable patent portfolios."

Click here to read more ...


Partner with us

Visit our new Partnership Portal for more information.

Submit your material

Submit hot news, product or article.

List your Products

Suppliers, list and add your products for free.

© 2018 Design And Reuse

All Rights Reserved.

No portion of this site may be copied, retransmitted,
reposted, duplicated or otherwise used without the
express written permission of Design And Reuse.