- TSMC Board of Directors Meeting Resolutions
- Arm Evolves Compute Platform Naming for the AI Era
- Arteris Announces Financial Results for the First Quarter and Estimated Second Quarter and Updated Full Year 2025 Guidance
- Canada's Chip Industry Charts Best Path to Growth
- QuickLogic Reports Fiscal First Quarter 2025 Financial Results
IP-SOC DAYS 2025 IP-SOC DAYS 2024 IP-SOC DAYS 2023 IP-SOC DAYS 2022 IP-SOC DAYS 2021 IP-SOC 2024 IP-SOC 2023 IP-SOC 2022 IP-SOC 2021
|
|||||||
![]() |
|

Arm's power play will backfire
- NVIDIA Unveils NVLink Fusion for Industry to Build Semi-Custom AI Infrastructure With NVIDIA Partner Ecosystem (May. 20, 2025)
- sureCore extends its sureFIT design service to include custom memory solutions for AI applications (May. 20, 2025)
- Versatile Whitebox 1G Ethernet PHY IP Core with BroadR-Reach™ for Connected Automotive and Industrial Systems (May. 19, 2025)
- Codasip: Toward Custom, Safe, Secure RISC-V Compute Cores (May. 19, 2025)
- Semidynamics: From RISC-V with AI to AI with RISC-V (May. 19, 2025)
- See Latest News>>
Oct. 30, 2024 –
By Jon Peddie (October 25, 2024)
It was stupid to bring the dispute into the public arena.
Arm’s attempts to increase licensing fees for companies like Qualcomm have led to a public dispute, highlighting concerns over future smartphone supply chains. Qualcomm received a termination notice for its architectural license, but it, along with Apple and Nvidia, could potentially shift away from Arm, thanks to their own CPU designs or alternatives like RISC-V. Arm’s public approach has backfired, negatively affecting its share price, and risks long-term business relationships, raising consumer and investor concerns over higher prices.